Search topics on this blog

Sunday 11 December 2011

Cameron’s veto, Europe and Scotland

veto from the Latin I forbid – a constitutional right to reject a legislative amendment.



Cameron’s fiasco at the EU summit was a disastrous negotiating and diplomatic failure in my view, but it has positive aspects as far as Scottish independence is concerned. (I may analyse this from a negotiator’s perspective later.) Whether they offset the undoubted threats caused by the UK being marginalised in Europe remains to be seen, but let me proceed to what I know may be regarded as a dangerously rash statement, one which I will probably regret.

I think the Scottish Government may have to re-think its timescale for the independence referendum, and by that, I mean bring it forward. 2014 at the earliest is now beginning to look like too late.

To use the telling phrase of an SNP branch colleague, the present situation has the feeling of a phoney war, a term coined to describe the period from September 1939 to May 1940 – from the UK’s declaration of war against Germany to the Battle of France and Dunkirk.

I recognise all the commitments made to timing in the second half of the term, repeated many times by the First Minister and others, but circumstance alter cases. The global situation and now the European situation have experienced a quantum shift since April/May of 2011. The new, deeply unstable situation created by David Cameron will potentially seriously damage the UK economy, and soon.

His government has no mandate from the people of Scotland, and unless Scotland, as a pro-European country, wants to be shackled to an anti-European dinosaur and retreat into the insularity of an offshore island of Europe, the Scottish people must have the chance to speak as soon as possible.

If the Coalition falls, Scotland would have the same voice that it had in May 2010 at a general election. What song it would sing is another question …

If it sang the same song, it would still be powerless against the Westminster numbers. There is little doubt that had Labour been in Government, the outcome of the EU summit would not have been much different. A general election now would probably produce another hung Parliament and another Coalition, even if there was a polarisation of the vote in England to Labour and the Tories.

It might result in something much worse if the extreme parties of the right caught a popular mood of anti-Europeanism coupled with a distrust of the three failed major parties – Tories, Labour and LibDems.

No one calls a referendum they don’t expect to win, but no one can ever be certain of the outcome of a referendum, especially in rapidly changing times.

Polls are snapshots of popular opinion at a point in time, but they are like a snapshot of a sunny day in Edinburgh – a moment later the sky opens and the wind cuts to the bone. And if you are lucky, the clouds part, the winds abate and the sun shines again. If you are not, and you are are not clad for heavy weather, a bolt hole must be found, and anyone that promises shelter will do.

A great Englishman once said "There is a tide in the affairs of men, which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune."

A great Scotsman, Robert the Bruce, was faced by a stark choice on of the 23rd and 24th of June 1314 - to be prepared to give battle against superior forces or retreat. Emboldened by his victory over an English knight, Henry de Bohun, in single combat, and by the unexpected route of a force of 300 hundred English knights under Clifford, he still was faced with the decision to either give battle or retreat. He chose to give battle, and to risk all for Scotland’s freedom.

Alex Salmond is not a 14th century knight, and he is not playing 14th century politics. But he will not be oblivious to the parallels. Bruce had not intended to give battle, but he reacted to rapidly changing circumstances, especially to the knowledge of the impact of his two unexpected successes on the already low morale of the superior force.

The First Minister has already killed his Henry de Bohun and his force have routed their Clifford. How will he assess the dynamics of a rapidly changing situation on his return from China?

I was puzzled and disappointed that no Scottish Government minister chose to appear of The Politics Show Scotland today to discuss the Eurozone/UK crisis. I dismiss out of hand the explanation that prior commitments or diaries had anything to do with this decision.

I also dismiss the inevitable unionist opposition conclusions – that the SNP has no coherent policy on Europe or that the party is a one-man band, waiting for Godot.

I think we can be reasonably certain that Scottish Government ministers have been in close contact with Alex Salmond, and that there is a bigger – perhaps a much bigger – game afoot.

Are we preparing to emerge from the Tor Wood?



8 comments:

  1. Peter, it's a no-brainer. There's not the slightest chance that the Scottish Government will have been sitting doing knitting whilst this pot-au-feu has been gathering its strength.

    The EU situation is in almighty flux and Call-me-Dave's centre-stage moment is no more than a meaningless gesture in a real-politik take of the bigger story; in, or out - and we're out - the game's lost!

    The money marketers will be cast from the temple, because they cannot improve this situation of their own cynical making, double-dip recession looms and to quote from another site "...if UK PLC ain't at the table, they're on it!"

    As you say ... there is a bigger – perhaps a much bigger – game afoot and thankfully, we can trust that our Scottish Government will be at the controls.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Somebody may have something to say to somebody after midnight.

    First arrow?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Peter. I hear what you say but as I keep saying it's all about 'the economy stupid'!!!
    it is only the time to go for it if a clear cogent case can be made that Scotland will be at least no worse off by seceding? My experience of England after nearly forty years living there is that the majority are hostile to Europe and would vote in a referendum to leave. The majority of Scots are not in that camp. However we aren't at that moment yet and if we get there as UK that may be the time to go for it. However in it or out of it we need to persuade the voters that we are better off independent. That case still needs to be articulated.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. If we don't get a move on, we won't have an economy to persuade them about, Fourfolksache.

    The lead time is just too great - a minimumn of two and a half years to the referendum then at least the same again in negotiation.

    Unless the FM has worked a miracle with China - and perhaps not even then - Westminster incompetents will have created economic and social chaos, with entirely unpredictable results.

    Its the diference between risk - calculable - and uncertainty - incalculable. If I must gamble, I'll gamble on freedom ...

    When the ship is sinking, it's not much help to say that we will take a vote on whether or not we should ask the captain to take to the life boats in two to three years time ...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Peter, I'm intrigued. What happens after midnight particularly?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Do we really want to have Brussels approve our budgets?

    Do we really want more regulation to strangle our commerce?

    Do we really want Brussels to dictate what our corporation tax rates must be?

    Maybe I'm wrong, maybe ewe should?

    ReplyDelete
  8. You're wrong - we must be in Europe. If you want to be isolated from Europe, you might as well stay in the UK, Keyboredwarrior.

    ReplyDelete