Search topics on this blog

Monday, 10 May 2010

John Reid tries to wreck LibLab pact negotiations

I listened with increasing incredulity to John Reid, former Labour Home Secretary and Cabinet Minister as he calmly rubbished the prospect of a LibLab pact and a rainbow coalition just after Gordon Brown, the Labour Prime Minister had already fallen on two of his swords – his premiership and his leadership of the Labour Party to permit negotiations to go ahead with Nick Clegg and his team to try and stop a Cameron-led Tory Government.


David Dimbleby’s loaded question was did John Reid think there was “a danger of a coalition of the losers …”?

Since Reid is too old a hand at responding to BBC inquisitors - however exalted - to be  gulled into an ill-considered expression of views, we must assume that every word was uttered with a purpose.

Reid opened with a token remark that Gordon Brown was “wise and dignified” in saying that he would step down, but this was immediately followed with a “but I’m afraid that I think it is a very bad mistake to contemplate and to propose – and I suppose, to entice – a LibLab coalition.”

Don’t hide your feelings John – say what you mean …

I think it is bad for the country. I think it will prove pretty disastrous for both parties in it – in fact, I think it’s bad for Gordon as well.”

He went on to say that such a coalition would be inherently unstable, since Labour and the LibDems have no overall majority and would be dependent on the votes of assorted “Scot nationalists” (sic)  – and the parties in Northern Ireland.

Reid went on in similar vein, coldly ignoring the fact that his fellow Scots - especially his fellow Labour voters - had just delivered a massive Niet to the Tories and to a Cameron government, having been specifically and repeatedly enjoined to do so in the Labour campaign by virtually every member of the Labour Cabinet. Scotland has just delivered a resounding  No to a Tory government, and after Gordon Brown dual sacrifice of his political career, with a finely judged negotiating strategy and the support of fellow Scots, could just achieve that outcome.

But John Reid has his eye fixed on the “national interest”. By this he means of course the UK, not the nation of his birth, and in this definition of the national interest at least, he is squarely in the camp of his fellow Unionist and Scot, Sir Menzies Campbell. But why not? After all, both of them have had glittering careers courtesy of the high road to England and the British Establishment.

With friends like Reid, Labour doesn’t need enemies.


  1. The mask slips on the British State, revealing the 'national interest' to be nothing other than the English national interest.

    Time the SNP government picked up on this & took to the fight to our Unionist opponents.

  2. It's not a fight we need, tartanseer, it's an intelligent analysis of who our potential friends are, and who we must focus on to advance the cause of Scottish independence.

    Our Unionist enemies are the LibDems and the Tories, but they are not Scottish Labour voters.

    Labour is now riven at the highest level by the resignation (probably forced) of gordon Brown and the betrayal of the Rainbow Alliance negotiations by John Reid, Douglas Alexander and others.

    English Labour voters will soon be clamouring for an English Parliament, and an anti-Scottish mood will develop. We must show them that our interest and theirs are identical.

  3. Aye, agreed, not a fight but a strong pro-independence message that doesn't pull punches.

    We need to push independence up the agenda, ensuring its overarching relevance to the Scottish people at every opportunity.

    Voting Labour is a dead end for Scotland; time to challenge this national abrogation of responsibility & if that involves upsetting a few delicate souls, then so be it.

    And I wouldn't depend on waiting for English voters to give us independence by default!